My Dad Is Genetically Superior To Your Dad Part 1

In the mid-nineteenth century, a German monk by the name of Gregor Mendel began experimenting with pea plants, which eventually led to him becoming the father of modern genetics.  Now of course at the time the idea of creating better animals and plants via breeding was not a new idea.  For thousands of years people had known that if you get two superior plants or animals to have sexy time then you have a chance of creating a new even more superior plant or animal.  However, Mendel was the first to understand the whole idea that such things were caused by genes that could be passed on both actively and recessively.  Of course, this amazing discovery was completely ignored for thirty years, and Mendel was largely forgotten until the start of the twentieth century when his findings were re-discovered.

It was an interesting time for science.  A growing understanding of the natural world had resulted in significant advances in industrialization and medicine, resulting in a rapid exponential growth in the human population never before seen in history.  However, this same growth in science also resulted in a better understanding of the affect people had on the environment, resulting in many predicting that it was just a matter of time before there were so many people that everything just kind of collapsed, resulting in the end of human civilization.  Given that this was the thought process of many of the leading minds when genetics became a thing, it’s not hard to see how some crazier ideas began to take shape, key amongst them the theory of eugenics, which is just a sciencey way of saying breeding people like animals.

Now the idea of eugenics is nothing new.  Throughout human history, groups have been rather less than kind to those deemed to have physical or mental handicaps or deficiencies.  However, the modern idea of eugenics stemmed from a man named Francis Galton, who was a cousin of Charles Darwin.  A big fan of his cousin’s theory of evolution, Galton took it a step further by claiming that pretty much all human traits were hereditary, and therefore if you wanted better people, all you had to do was control which ones were allowed to fuck.  It’s probably worth mentioning that when it comes to physical traits, Galton wasn’t wrong.  However, Galton also claimed the same was true for things like intelligence or just being a nice person.

Now at the time, Galton was one of the most respected scientists in the world, being one of the first to apply large-scale statistics to world issues.  His accomplishments included creating the first weather map, devising a method to classify fingerprints, calculating the optimal method for making tea, inventing a whistle for hearing tests, and statistically proving that prayer did diddly squat to help people.  Through years of rigorous statistical study, Galton became convinced that people who did better in society did so because they had superior parentage.  While such theories were fully embraced by the rich and powerful, for reasons that should be obvious as shit, it really didn’t take off until the early twentieth century when people first began to fully understand the idea of genetics.

For the first time in history, those who were economically better off finally had what they thought was scientific proof of what they had always thought was true.  Namely, that they were genetically superior to everybody else, and would be regardless of education or living conditions.  These members of the upper crust, rather excited over such things, threw massive amounts of money to spur on further research on how great they were, effectively creating a new academic discipline at universities around the world.  In thanks, the researchers at these universities threw themselves fully into studying the effects of genetics on social standing and the rise and fall of societies and civilizations.  Things of course got pretty fucked up.

Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gregor_Mendel_with_cross.jpg

Welles's War of the Words

It’s supposedly a well known story.  In 1938, Orson Welles and his Mercury Theater radio show decided to jazz things up a bit by doing a modern day rendition of the famous book “War of the Worlds” by H.G. Wells.  The book, only forty years old at that point, told the story of a Martian attack on London.  Aside from being a pretty heavy analogy on British imperialism, it was also dull as hell.  Though lots of different people claim credit for coming up with the idea, it was eventually decided to present the story via a series of fake news casts interrupting a pretend show playing music.  By which I mean the cast and crew, shitting their pants over how completely boring the story was going to be, just kind of threw together a cockamamie scheme right before the broadcast began.  For the listeners at home, a brief announcement that the upcoming story was completely fiction was followed by 40 uninterrupted minutes of pure lunacy.  Through the fake news bulletins, the radio show followed the fictionalized account of a strange cylinder landing near the real town of Grover’s Mill, New Jersey.  Eventually the cylinder opens, revealing Martians, who start killing people willy-nilly.  The army is sent in, but is defeated, people rush to flee the onslaught, and the Martians attack New York City.  All pretty standard science fiction for the day.

Now according to the stories spread about the broadcast, Americans at the time were apparently stupid as shit.  Taking the radio broadcast to be real, millions of people across the country panicked.  People reportedly fled their homes en masse, running from the coming Martians.  Bands of armed men roved the streets.  Some people became so hysterical that they had heart attacks, while others contemplated suicide in order to end things on their terms.  Phones at police stations and newspaper offices rang constantly, and hospital waiting rooms were overwhelmed by people injured in the wild flailing around of society.  The newspapers the next day were filled with hundreds of such stories from across the nation.  American’s demanded Orson Welles’ head for the stunt, and he was forced to issue an official apology.  Today it stands as one of the greatest stories of mass hysteria in American history, which it is, just not in the way you think.

If you haven’t guessed the premise of all this yet, then you might have fallen for such shenanigans if you lived back then.  That’s right.  It was almost all completely bullshit.  To start, not many people actually tuned into the radio show.  The Mercury Theater wasn’t that widely listened to because it was in the same time slot as one of the most popular shows on the radio at the time, which starred the ventriloquist Edgar Bergen.  That’s right, the most popular radio show of 1938 was a ventriloquist act.  I’ll let that sink in for a moment.  Okay, back to business.  So again, not very many people even listened to the broadcast of War of the Worlds, and even fewer actually panicked.  Now that’s not to say that some didn’t.  After all, the United States had a population of 130 million people back then, just based on statistics there were bound to be some idiots.  There were some reports of panics.  For instance, across the nation the occasional person did call in to their local police, newspaper, or radio station to ask if the radio show was real, especially from listeners in New Jersey.  As well, in Grover’s Mill, New Jersey, purported center of the invasion, a couple of drunks did go out with rifles and shoot at the town’s water tower.  So yeah, there were definitely some idiots out there, but a bunch of idiots out there is pretty different than an entire country freaking the fuck out.

This was something that Orson Welles figured out pretty quickly after his initial apology.  In interviews afterwards he pretty much said the whole thing was overblown and ridiculous, though later in life he himself did play it up as some grand wide reaching scheme that he cooked up for publicity.  According to the newspapers of the day, the panic was proof of how easily the new fangled thing called radio could manipulate the public.  In truth, it was actually proof of how easily journalists could do the same, conflating a couple of random reports into a nationwide story. To understand why the newspapers would do such a thing, one only has to understand what was happening within the industry.  Newspapers, once the only source for news in the country, were facing increasing competition from radios and movie theater news reels.  Readership was declining, which meant advertising revenue was doing the same, and some pundits were predicting the eventual end of newspapers all together.  It was pretty much the same as when newspapers print disparaging articles about the internet.

Outside of the newspaper accounts, there exists little to no proof of any kind of panic.  A researcher did put together a study in 1940 suggesting millions freaked out, but later critics pointed out that the study was pretty much just made up.  As for the newspapers, they kept hammering on the story for about three weeks, with a number of stories bluntly claiming that radio listeners were all mentally deficient, but finally abandoned it to go back to actually reporting on things like the real news.  However, by that time the story had reached Adolf Hitler in Germany, who mentioned the so-called panic in one of his speeches as an example of the decadent corruption created by democracy.  As for Orson Welles, the whole mess catapulted his career, allowing him to secure funding for a little film called "Citizen Kane”, which became one of the most famous movies in history.

Image: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Welles-Radio-Studio-1938.jpg

The Great Fat Cover Up

By the time the mid-1950’s rolled around, the American scientific community was becoming increasingly alarmed at the growing trend of people dying of heart attacks.  Society was changing quickly.  Where once people had mostly lived in rural areas doing physical labor each day, the modern American was urban and desk bound.  Though advances in medicine were rapidly doing away with the threat of infectious disease, long the number one killer, heart disease was rising rapidly.  Luckily, one Minnesota scientist, a man named Dr. Ancel Keys, believed he had the answer.  Dr. Keys was one of the first to note that the rise in heart disease in the U.S. correlated quite well with a rise in meat consumption.  The American economy was booming, and as American’s became wealthier, they were stuffing more meat down their gullets.  In 1955, with absolutely no proof whatsoever, Dr. Keys went before the World Health Organization and declared his lipid theory, which stated that dietary fat raised cholesterol, which in turn increased heart disease.  According to Dr. Keys, the only way to reverse the terrible trend was for people to switch a large part of their consumption of animal fats to healthier vegetable oils.

In 1958, in an attempt to actually prove his theory, Dr. Keys launched what became known as the Seven Country Study, one of the largest dietary studies in history.  While Dr. Keys collected massive amounts of data, he also hit the road, promoting his lipid theory throughout the 1960’s.  Though the general public was less than interested, the scientific community largely embraced the lipid theory, especially as several smaller observational studies were released supporting it.

It was at this point that a man named Dr. Ivan Frantz entered the picture.  Dr. Frantz, also from Minnesota, was a colleague and fervent supporter of Dr. Keys’ lipid theory.  In 1968, wanting to forever end debate on the subject, Dr. Frantz concocted one of the most precise dietary studies in history.  The problem then, and still today, with dietary studies was that they were based off of observational studies, where volunteers kept food journals that reported what they ate.  These studies had a significant problem in that it was not unusual for people to forget and/or lie when recording what they had eaten.  Dr. Frantz got around this issue by not using volunteers, but rather 9,500 mental patients housed in Minnesota’s psychiatric wards.  Since the diet of the patients was controlled, Dr. Frantz could easily randomly assign half a diet high in animal fats and the other half a diet high in vegetable oils.  Since this was the 1960’s, the state officials running the psychiatric wards were perfectly a-okay with all of this.

In 1970, Dr. Keys released the results of his Seven Country Study, which lo and behold proved his lipid theory utterly and completely correct.  The idea that high cholesterol caused heart disease fully entered the public sphere; and health organizations, the U.S. government, and oilseed farmers began a concerted effort to get people to switch from animal fats to vegetable oils.  As a result of these efforts, consumption of red meat and animal fats began to decline and consumption of vegetable oils increased.  It was perhaps the largest and most rapid shift in American diets in history.

Dr. Frantz was eager for his study to be the proverbial nail in the coffin of animal fats.  However, when he started going through his data in 1973, he found things not to be as expected.  While the vegetable oil group most definitely did have lower cholesterol levels, their risk of dying of heart disease actually increased.  This left Dr. Frantz in a befuddled mess, at least until a group of Australian scientists released a long-term observational study supporting the lipid theory later that year.  With such further evidence available, Dr. Frantz assumed that he must have fucked up his own study somehow, put all of his data in his basement, and forgot about it.

The lipid theory remained concrete science for the next forty years, a period that saw vegetable oils become a significant portion of the American diet.  However, cracks began to appear in the claim in 2011, when a scientist found Dr. Frantz’s data and published the results, causing a huge stir in the scientific world.  This was followed by a review of both the Australian study and the all important Seven Country Study, both of which revealed that data had been left out that would’ve supported Dr. Frantz’s findings.  Forty years of dietary advice had been built on a house of cards.  While scientists continue to disagree on what this all means, it is worth noting that the decline in animal fat consumption resulted in an increase in sugar consumption, since vegetable oils tend to taste like garbage on their own.  This increase has been tied to rising obesity and diabetes rates.  Happy eating.

Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Legumes-665788.jpg